cheaper isn't always better
One common misconception many people have about frugal living is that it emphasizes cost as the single most important determining factor in selecting a product or service.
Well, that's not always true. Every time you choose between a variety of products or services, you're making a trade-off between price and a variety of perceived outcomes. These outcomes can be categorized as personal effects, which represent how the individual relates to the product or service, and interpersonal effects, which reflect how the buyer perceives the product or service will affect his or her relationship with others. The personal effects are identified as:
Interpersonal effects are:
More than one of these conditions can be present in any purchase. Put them together with varying levels of price sensitivity, and the balance between these factors becomes a fascinating insight into human behavior.
Of course, sometimes imbalance leads to bad decision-making. This is the case with my phone service.
First, a little background: I didn't cave and get a cell phone until last year, and the only reason I did was that the bossman, Mr. Zero Boundaries, made me. Call on Saturday morning? Sure! Phone at 6:00 a.m. during the week? Why not!
My cell phone is paid for by my employer; I would never let anyone irritate me like that for free. I thought about dumping my land line, but cell service in my concrete-bound Manhattan apartment is iffy and my parents have a hard enough time hearing me bellowing down the receiver without adding static into the mix. As a result, I decided to keep my land line.
My land line, as a rule, is an annoyance. While it's nice to be able to call anywhere in the country for a fixed rate, the taxes and fees that go along with a standard land line service are astronomical. I muddled along with it for years, though, until one day I was motivated to change. My DSL provider, Earthstink, sent me notices on a weekly basis advertising their high-quality, high availability VOIP service plus DSL package for significantly less than it costs to get the two services from different providers. In January, I finally took the bait.
How sorry I am.
I have had phone outages every three weeks like clockwork ever since. It normally takes between thirty minutes and three hours to reach a first-level technician, and my call usually has to be passed up the line to levels two and three. This transfer involves more wait time, along with the same damned conversation, over and over: No, I have no dial tone. No, I don't have another phone to plug into the jack; I only have one phone. Yes, I only have one phone. I can't plug my phone into another jack; there's only one. Yes, one jack. Have you ever been in an apartment in Manhattan? I have had between seven and nine phone outages in total since getting Earthstink phone service, and each time it requires a committment of two to six hours to get a resolution or at least a trouble ticket. Trouble tickets often take two days to resolve.
While it's great that I have a cell phone to call in reports about my land line not working, the fact that service is iffy means that I frequently lose connections halfway through. Once I got a callback from a concerned agent, but normally it means lining up in the tech support queue all over again.
When going through this yet again last night (three hours in total plus a callback at 1:45 a.m. to tell me that my phone line was operational), I realized that twenty bucks a month in savings is not worth the rage and spikes in blood pressure I get from dealing with Earthstink tech support. When you trade away an expensive but perfectly good service for a lemon, as I did, what recourse do you have?
1. Do your homework before you change service providers. The Better Business Bureau is an outstanding resource for making an informed decision about what you're getting into.
2. Document, document, document. Each time you have a failure of service, write down who you spoke with, the substance of the conversation, when you spoke, and how long it took. Nothing speaks louder than a written record.
3. Keep your cool. At least one person I spoke to was willing to say anything just because he wanted to get the crazy white lady off the phone. While going medieval on some schmuck whose job it is to answer the phone may make you feel better in the short run, in the long run it's counterproductive: no first point of contact you reach has any significant decision-making power, and yelling at the first point of contact doesn't inspire that person to want to be helpful.
4.Ask to speak to a supervisor. Unfortunately, this didn't really work too well with Earthstink. Each time I asked, I was told that it wasn't possible to speak to a supervisor, but that my complaint would be escalated (my ass it was), or I could send a complaint through the website feedback form. The website feedback form is cathartic in a way, but similar to yelling at the person on the other end of the phone, it doesn't generate a response.
5. The Better Business Bureau can help. The BBB does an excellent job of investigating complaints, and their records are public. Once consumer issues are brought to the BBB's attention, the path to resolution usually gets a lot shorter.
6. Get familiar with other consumer advocacy groups in your area. A quick Google search turned up Consumer Advocacy, Consumer Action, the FTC Consumer Complaint form, and many others. Before contacting a consumer advocacy organization, however, make sure that the organization is a legitimate non-profit, rather than a thinly disguised ad for paid legal services.
7. If all else fails, get a lawyer. I don't agree with how litigious US society is, but if you're truly at the end of your rope or there are genuinely heavy personal damages, sometimes legal help is in order.
I'm not a legal expert, so don't follow this advice blindly: look at your individual circumstances and make your own conclusions about the best course of action. In my case, the BBB now has a long and bitter complaint about Earthstink on their hands. I can hardly wait to see how it plays out.
In the meantime, if you're considering the combined DSL and phone package through Earthstink, make sure you save steps 1 through 7 above; you'll probably need them.
You have been warned.


7 retorts. What say you?
I completely agree with you. It's better to buy based on value and not only on price or "cheapness". The old adage is true, you get what you pay for.
-limeade
http://fiscalmusings.blogspot.com
That's true to a point, I think. I wouldn't pay extra for a shirt because it had some brand name or other on it; that seems silly. To the extent that price and quality are both maximized, though, I definitely agree.
Price and quality? Cars. Buy a cheap car often you spend more on repairs. I'm not saying don't buy used, but maybe buy a used honda instead of a used ford.
Also buy good cookware. Makes cooking better and easier. Saves money long term when you keep it 20 years. Maybe my family is just frugal like that, buy new car = 20 years. Buy new pots and pans top of the line = 20 years.
Also my luxury is cell phones. I would not be able to chat with my family living 1/2 a world away if not for cell phones. And prepaid cells don't cut it. I talk to my mom daily, best friend almost daily, grandma every other day. BIL/in-laws call DH almost every 2-3 days. Sure it's expensive, but I'd be lonely without it.
I come from a Honda family. We converted after disastrous experiences with Chevys, Opels and Buicks. My folks' Honda is twenty years old and still going strong. Every car I've ever owned (I don't have one now; it's mostly a public safety issue) has been a used Honda.
Yes, yes on the cookware. I've had my Anolon set for fifteen years and it's been outstanding.
It sounds like the cell phone gives you a great deal of joy, and you can't really put a price on family and friends. I talk to my parents and sibling every day on my crap VOIP line that I probably wouldn't otherwise have. Totally worth it.
We signed up for Vonage just over a year ago. At first we'd have dropped calls, but hubby found out we needed a firmware update on our router. Since then it works like a charm!
We are a Toyota family here. Every car (except one) has been a Toyota. We bought a Chevy right after 9/11. American pride. 0% financing. Couldn't pass it up. Should have. Within 2 weeks I hated that van. Couldn't wait to turn it in. Dumped it for a Toyota as soon as I could. Never again.
Our motto here is "you get what you pay for."
I agree with what you're saying. I don't think that "you get what you pay for" is necessarily true though. I think that is often just a way to rationalize an expensive purchase.
Karen - I've heard good things about Vonage. I'm glad it's working so well for you. Toyota is my second-choice car; they've had marvelous success with the hybrids in particular in the past couple of years.
The expression "you get what you pay for" is interesting. I've never managed to figure it out completely: does it treat the interpersonal effects (e.g. conspicuous value, unique value, or social value) and the personal effects (quality and emotional value) equally? It sounds like it does, but I think that's a subjective determination; the balance is different for every person.
tight fisted miser - first of all, that's an excellent name; second, to follow on with the point I was trying to make in reply to Karen's comment above, I think the "you get what you pay for" statement is applicable if the interpersonal effects of a product are weighed as being equal to the personal effects. In other words, if having someone's designer logo splayed all over my ass is as important to me as knowing that my pants won't rip when I sit down, then I can justify paying a high price for them. If I just want the pants not to rip and don't care about the logo, then I'm likely to go for the cheaper pair that doesn't have the logo but are dependable as far as the rippage goes. In that case, would I agree that "you get what you pay for"? Probably not.
Not sure if that made sense or not. You tell me. ;-)
Post a Comment